[geomoose-psc] PSC! PSC! PSC!

[Dan Little]

Having not settled on something that there was general agreement on, I
think we will stick with IRC.

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 09:33 Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com> wrote:

> Are we using IRC or a web meeting software for this?
>
>
>
> *Brian Fischer*
>
> Project Manager - GIS  |  Principal
>
> Houston Engineering, Inc.
>
> *O* 763.493.4522 | *D* 763.493.6664 | *F* 763.493.5572
>
>
>
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Dan Little
> *Sent:* Monday, September 24, 2018 7:48 PM
> *To:* TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] PSC! PSC! PSC!
>
>
>
> *[External Email]*
> ------------------------------
>
> Hey everybody!
>
>
>
> Everyone is available on Tuesday, October 2nd, 10:00AM (Central). Please
> mark your calendars!
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:11 AM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> We use Zoom at work, but FYI it is limited to 40 minute calls unless you
> have a service plan.
>
>
>
> Recently I've used Jitsi for some one-on-one calls with Canada, and it has
> been great. Supposedly it works with a group, but I haven't tried pushing
> it.
>
>
>
> [1] https://jitsi.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Zoom requires a Java app. I've been able to use it on Mint, OS/X, and
> Windows successfully. I'm presenting it as an option if people would like
> to try. IRC is good but if there was a preference for actual voice to voice
> communication I wanted to open that up as well.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:49 AM Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Re: Zoom.   IIRC our IRC meetings fulfill the in public and logged
> requirements for OSGeo.  Does Zoom handle this?
>
> I haven't tried Zoom, but if it requires more than a vanilla browser or
> FOSS client app I'm not going to be happy.
>
> Related experience:
>
> I'll only run WebEx in a VM because of how invasive is it - installs a
> binary plugin that you can't audit that can scrape your screen and inject
> keyboard/mouse events - not cool.
>
> Join.me work fine in a browser for viewing/participating in the call but
> requires an executable to share screen.
>
>
>
> On 09/18/2018 09:39 AM, Dan Little wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
>
>
> It's been too long! As Chair this is completely my fault but I would love
> to get together for a PSC meeting to discuss some of the on going ideas
> y'all may have had recently with GeoMoose and/or your experience with 3.X.
> I've been cooking up some new work and wanted to open the floor to talk
> about it.
>
>
>
> Proposed agenda:
>
> 1. Funding and future development efforts.
>
>  a. Budget
>
>  b. 2019 Code sprint proposal(s)
>
> 2. Open Floor on 3.X experiences
>
> 3. Things Duck wants to fix and would like some feedback about
>
>   a. How accessible is setting up a basic application?
>
>   b. What are some common complaints?
>
>   c. The big a/b answer I have heard so far is "Services don't make as
> much sense anymore", I would love some suggestions on how to tackle that.
>
>
>
> I would like to do a Zoom meeting if folks are amendable to that (WebEx
> like).
>
>
>
> And here is the obligatory doodle:
>
> - https://doodle.com/poll/bbfakds63rqa3u7h
>
>
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> geomoose-psc mailing list
>
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20181002/fee5b37c/attachment.html>