[geomoose-psc] GeoMoose issue organization
Eli Adam
eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
Mon Apr 29 10:20:50 PDT 2019
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:24 PM James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I updated the milestones for the gm3 repo to start mapping out 3.3.1/3.4/4.0 mostly based on how I guessed resolving the issues would impact semver rules. Although my main goal was to try and get a feel for what we can realistically hope to achieve for 3.3.1.
>
Thanks, accurate labels make it easier to sort through issues.
> A lot of the issues I added to 3.3.1 appear like they may be already resolved but didn't get closed. I figure those should be easy (quick verify and click close).
>
> And this isn't ruling out a 3.3.2 either if some fixes are quick and others need more time.
>
> I also created issue #376 to start a discussion on what we are doing with the mobile example. I'm not sure how much we can do there without forcing a 4.0.
>
> Personally, I feel we as a project would benefit from a bug squashing and documentation sprint (the OSGeo community sprint in May may be a good opportunity for this).
>
Yes, this could be good! I won't be there in person but could join
some of it remotely.
Best regards, Eli
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list