[geomoose-psc] dist contents in Releases
Brent Fraser
bfraser at GeoAnalytic.com
Fri Jul 17 11:51:23 PDT 2020
Thanks for the info. I was wondering if a common use-case would be a Linux
admin wanting to just install GeoMoose and try the demo with no intent to
debug etc. Should we require them to install Node and do the build? Can
we just include the geomoose.min.js in the dist dir?
Thanks!
Brent
----------------------------------------
From: "Jim Klassen" <klassen.js at gmail.com>
Sent: July 17, 2020 9:58 AM
To: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] dist contents in Releases
The /dist/ folder (and contents) is basically the sum total of the release.
The rest of the files are included basically for convenience sake (source
code, examples/demos, documentation) but aren't needed (well examples is
needed for the out of the box "demo" but people really shouldn't be using
that for a production application, but should use them as starting points
and make their own files in their own folders).
The MS4W and Linux packages are structured differently to ease migration
from GeoMoose 2.x. I would say installing from the NPM package or git
would be the preferred/modern option.
The npm package has /package/dist
The Linux package has /gm3-exmaples/htdocs/geomoose/dist
The MS4W package has /ms4w/apps/gm3/htdocs/geomoose/dist
On 7/16/20 4:29 PM, Brent Fraser wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a reason why we don't include the "dist" directory and contents
(specifically geomoose.min.js) in a Release package?
Thanks!
Brent
_______________________________________________ geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20200717/dce4c913/attachment.html>
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list