[geomoose-psc] Please add comments to last weeks agenda

[TC Haddad]

If the question is primarily between Slack and Discord, I'd prefer Slack,
if nothing else, primarily for consolidation purposes. I've used Discord,
but it doesn't run as well on all my devices, so I'd prefer not to deal
with those inconsistencies, among other reasons.

I don't mind continuing the meetings on IRC, and will be careful to not
miss the reminders in future months.  I wonder if we should reconsider the
time slot - maybe moving it yet another half hour later would work out
better? it's a little odd to start a meeting on the half-hour (causes me to
have a lot of 1/2 hour conflicts). But maybe that is just me...

Like Jim, I do like the fact that referencing the list archives is a good
form of project memory, and there really isn't another equivalent to that
particular function. That doesn't necessarily mean that we have to have all
discussions there - we would just need to have an intentional practice
where, if a discussion topic blows up on Slack, we make a point to copy the
main points back to the email list for any final votes or long term
outcomes to be captured and agreed on. I see other communities struggle
with this a little bit, but it could be as simple as checking once a month,
before a PSC meeting, if anything significant happened and needs to be
cross-posted.

Tanya

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:41 AM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Any one have thoughts on using something like Slack or Discord?
>
> Con:
> - Not full open source managed.
> - Not necessarily "universal" in the same as IRC.
>
> Pro:
> - Logging
> - Web based client
> - Data "take away" tools.
>
> After the kurfluffle with freenode, I'm not sure there is much distance in
> politics between something like Discord or Slack and IRC.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24 AM Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree, I prefer meeting live on IRC.  I added my comments, but I wasn't
>> really sure where to respond to various points in this format.
>>
>> On 1/26/22 09:56, Eli Adam wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dan and all,
>>
>> I added some comments to the wiki.
>>
>> Generally I don't like the asynchronous meeting style.  I find myself
>> tediously commenting on points that would be a rapid discussion.  I am a
>> big fan of *preparation* in advance of a meeting and think we could do more
>> of that to make our discussion more rapid and productive.
>>
>> We should probably start our next meeting by running through these points
>> for discussion.  Maybe preparing for the meeting in advance as well.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:32 AM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Folks!
>>>
>>> Please add your comments and that you've reviewed last week's PSC
>>> meeting notes:
>>>
>>> - https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/wiki/PSC-Meeting-2022-01-21
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing listgeomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20220128/4b20bc8d/attachment.html>