[geomoose-psc] Please add comments to last weeks agenda

James Klassen klassen.js at gmail.com
Mon Jan 31 07:21:08 PST 2022


1pm central works for me

> On Jan 31, 2022, at 08:22, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> 
> That timeslot could work for me (3pm Atlantic).  Since the PSC meetings are the 3rd Friday of the month (correct me if I'm wrong) that means Friday at 3pm to 4pm here.  (productivity does decrease for the later Friday meetings though, ha)
> 
> I'd prefer IRC, as Libera chat is very stable (zero issues since it was created).  Also, I've been saving and posting the log online for the MapServer PSC meetings, I could do the same for the #geomoose meetings.
> 
> I also prefer the scheduled monthly meetings, rather than unplanned ad hoc discussions, that are harder to follow.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 2022-01-29 9:59 a.m., Dan Little wrote:
>> +1 to a time change, that regular time slot has been getting hit by some of my rotating meetings -- this is new for 2022!
>> How do folks feel about the 2:00PM Eastern / 1:00PM Central / Noon Mountain / 11:00AM Pacific timeslot?
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com <mailto:tchaddad at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>    If the question is primarily between Slack and Discord, I'd prefer
>>    Slack, if nothing else, primarily for consolidation purposes. I've
>>    used Discord, but it doesn't run as well on all my devices, so I'd
>>    prefer not to deal with those inconsistencies, among other reasons.
>>    I don't mind continuing the meetings on IRC, and will be careful to
>>    not miss the reminders in future months.  I wonder if we should
>>    reconsider the time slot - maybe moving it yet another half hour
>>    later would work out better? it's a little odd to start a meeting on
>>    the half-hour (causes me to have a lot of 1/2 hour conflicts). But
>>    maybe that is just me...
>>    Like Jim, I do like the fact that referencing the list archives is a
>>    good form of project memory, and there really isn't another
>>    equivalent to that particular function. That doesn't necessarily
>>    mean that we have to have all discussions there - we would just need
>>    to have an intentional practice where, if a discussion topic blows
>>    up on Slack, we make a point to copy the main points back to the
>>    email list for any final votes or long term outcomes to be captured
>>    and agreed on. I see other communities struggle with this a little
>>    bit, but it could be as simple as checking once a month, before a
>>    PSC meeting, if anything significant happened and needs to be
>>    cross-posted.
>>    Tanya
>>    On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:41 AM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com
>>    <mailto:theduckylittle at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>        Any one have thoughts on using something like Slack or Discord?
>>        Con:
>>        - Not full open source managed.
>>        - Not necessarily "universal" in the same as IRC.
>>        Pro:
>>        - Logging
>>        - Web based client
>>        - Data "take away" tools.
>>        After the kurfluffle with freenode, I'm not sure there is much
>>        distance in politics between something like Discord or Slack and
>>        IRC.
>>        On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24 AM Jim Klassen
>>        <klassen.js at gmail.com <mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>            I agree, I prefer meeting live on IRC.  I added my comments,
>>            but I wasn't really sure where to respond to various points
>>            in this format.
>>>            On 1/26/22 09:56, Eli Adam wrote:
>>>            Hi Dan and all,
>>> 
>>>            I added some comments to the wiki.
>>> 
>>>            Generally I don't like the asynchronous meeting style.  I
>>>            find myself tediously commenting on points that would be a
>>>            rapid discussion.  I am a big fan of *preparation* in
>>>            advance of a meeting and think we could do more of that to
>>>            make our discussion more rapid and productive.
>>> 
>>>            We should probably start our next meeting by running
>>>            through these points for discussion.  Maybe preparing for
>>>            the meeting in advance as well.
>>> 
>>>            Best regards, Eli
>>> 
>>>            On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:32 AM Dan Little
>>>            <theduckylittle at gmail.com
>>>            <mailto:theduckylittle at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>                Hey Folks!
>>> 
>>>                Please add your comments and that you've reviewed last
>>>                week's PSC meeting notes:
>>> 
>>>                -
>>>                https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/wiki/PSC-Meeting-2022-01-21
>>>                <https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/wiki/PSC-Meeting-2022-01-21>
>>> 
>>>                Cheers!
>>>                _______________________________________________
>>>                geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>                geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>                <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>                https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>                <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>            _______________________________________________
>>>            geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>            geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org  <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>            https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc  <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>>            _______________________________________________
>>            geomoose-psc mailing list
>>            geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>            <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>            https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>            <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        geomoose-psc mailing list
>>        geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>        https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>        <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    geomoose-psc mailing list
>>    geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff McKenna
> GatewayGeo: Developers of MS4W, MapServer Consulting and Training
> co-founder of FOSS4G
> http://gatewaygeo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc


More information about the geomoose-psc mailing list