From tchaddad at gmail.com  Thu Jan  8 19:37:13 2026
From: tchaddad at gmail.com (TC Haddad)
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 19:37:13 -0800
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
Message-ID: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>

Happy New Year GeoMoosers,

Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and
short-turnaround items for everyone:

   - *January Meeting change: *would it be ok to bump our normal PSC
   meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5
   Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would
   avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.

   - *Budget Revision:* it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by
   @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in
   keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest
   we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can
   be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into
   a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.

If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your
replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to
be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account
for time zones.

best,
Tanya
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260108/0dea75d8/attachment.htm>

From eadam at co.lincoln.or.us  Thu Jan  8 20:27:37 2026
From: eadam at co.lincoln.or.us (Eli Adam)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 04:27:37 +0000
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
In-Reply-To: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Tanya,

Thanks for leading on this.

1/23 works better for me than 1/16.

I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).  I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000 without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are above the guideline so we're in good(?) company, https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.

Best regards, Eli

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items


Happy New Year GeoMoosers,

Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and short-turnaround items for everyone:

  *   January Meeting change: would it be ok to bump our normal PSC meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5 Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.

  *   Budget Revision: it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.

If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account for time zones.

best,
Tanya

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260109/326519da/attachment.htm>

From chughes at co.lincoln.or.us  Mon Jan 12 07:41:51 2026
From: chughes at co.lincoln.or.us (Christopher Hughes)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:41:51 +0000
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>

1/23 works for me.

--
Chris Hughes

GIS Analyst
Lincoln County GIS Department
880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
Tel: (541) 574 1283

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>; TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items

Hi Tanya,

Thanks for leading on this.

1/23 works better for me than 1/16.

I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).  I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000 without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are above the guideline so we're in good(?) company, https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.

Best regards, Eli

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items


Happy New Year GeoMoosers,

Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and short-turnaround items for everyone:

  *   January Meeting change: would it be ok to bump our normal PSC meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5 Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.

  *   Budget Revision: it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.

If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account for time zones.

best,
Tanya

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260112/d424dcc9/attachment-0001.htm>

From theduckylittle at gmail.com  Mon Jan 12 08:23:01 2026
From: theduckylittle at gmail.com (Dan Little)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:23:01 -0600
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>

1/23 is slightly better for me!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41?AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> 1/23 works for me.
>
> --
> Chris Hughes
>
> GIS Analyst
> Lincoln County GIS Department
> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
> Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>; TC Haddad <
> tchaddad at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>
> Hi Tanya,
>
> Thanks for leading on this.
>
> 1/23 works better for me than 1/16.
>
> I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget
> request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).
> I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000
> without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to
> allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are
> above the guideline so we're in good(?) company,
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think
> the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to
> projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
> TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>
>
> Happy New Year GeoMoosers,
>
> Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and
> short-turnaround items for everyone:
>
>    - *January Meeting change: *would it be ok to bump our normal PSC
>    meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5
>    Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would
>    avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.
>
>    - *Budget Revision:* it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by
>    @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in
>    keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest
>    we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can
>    be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into
>    a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.
>
> If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your
> replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to
> be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account
> for time zones.
>
> best,
> Tanya
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260112/2ca3b4fc/attachment.htm>

From klassen.js at gmail.com  Tue Jan 13 20:52:48 2026
From: klassen.js at gmail.com (James Klassen)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:52:48 -0600
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
In-Reply-To: <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>

1/23 works for me.

No objections from me on confirming to OSGeo budget request.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:23 Dan Little via geomoose-psc <
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> 1/23 is slightly better for me!
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41?AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> 1/23 works for me.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hughes
>>
>> GIS Analyst
>> Lincoln County GIS Department
>> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
>> Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
>> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>; TC Haddad <
>> tchaddad at gmail.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>>
>> Hi Tanya,
>>
>> Thanks for leading on this.
>>
>> 1/23 works better for me than 1/16.
>>
>> I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget
>> request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).
>> I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000
>> without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to
>> allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are
>> above the guideline so we're in good(?) company,
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think
>> the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to
>> projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
>> TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
>> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Subject:* [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>>
>>
>> Happy New Year GeoMoosers,
>>
>> Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and
>> short-turnaround items for everyone:
>>
>>    - *January Meeting change: *would it be ok to bump our normal PSC
>>    meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5
>>    Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would
>>    avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.
>>
>>    - *Budget Revision:* it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by
>>    @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in
>>    keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest
>>    we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can
>>    be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into
>>    a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.
>>
>> If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your
>> replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to
>> be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account
>> for time zones.
>>
>> best,
>> Tanya
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260113/e0e08e85/attachment-0001.htm>

From theduckylittle at gmail.com  Mon Jan 19 15:10:48 2026
From: theduckylittle at gmail.com (Dan Little)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:10:48 -0600
Subject: [geomoose-psc] GeoMoose 3 GeoParquet Support Scope of Work
Message-ID: <CABqPoBZwfJAy6rBMzc9Z9BFaJprOb+_hULa_S0rshkDxrgpHhQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Folks,

I've attached my proposed scope of work for the GeoParquet addition to
GeoMoose 3.

Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260119/a519ae6e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2026 GeoParquet Proposal.md
Type: text/markdown
Size: 1182 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260119/a519ae6e/attachment.md>

From eadam at co.lincoln.or.us  Fri Jan 23 07:48:53 2026
From: eadam at co.lincoln.or.us (Eli Adam)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:48:53 +0000
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items - today
In-Reply-To: <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <PH0PR09MB8635C035184B1190F19C22CBCA94A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>

Just a reminder this is today, since it?s not our usual week and might not be on people?s calendars.

Eli



Sent from mobile with limited functionality.


Eli L Adam, PLS

County Surveyor

Lincoln County Surveyor's Office
880 NE 7th Street | Newport, OR 97365
eadam at co.lincoln.or.us<mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> | 541-574-1289

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of James Klassen via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:52:48 PM
To: Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
Cc: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items

1/23 works for me.

No objections from me on confirming to OSGeo budget request.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:23 Dan Little via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
1/23 is slightly better for me!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41?AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
1/23 works for me.

--
Chris Hughes

GIS Analyst
Lincoln County GIS Department
880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
Tel: (541) 574 1283

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>; TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com<mailto:tchaddad at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items

Hi Tanya,

Thanks for leading on this.

1/23 works better for me than 1/16.

I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).  I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000 without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are above the guideline so we're in good(?) company, https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.

Best regards, Eli

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items


Happy New Year GeoMoosers,

Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and short-turnaround items for everyone:

  *   January Meeting change: would it be ok to bump our normal PSC meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5 Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.

  *   Budget Revision: it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.

If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account for time zones.

best,
Tanya

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260123/d53f4918/attachment-0001.htm>

From theduckylittle at gmail.com  Fri Jan 23 07:52:07 2026
From: theduckylittle at gmail.com (Dan Little)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:52:07 -0600
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items - today
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR09MB8635C035184B1190F19C22CBCA94A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635C035184B1190F19C22CBCA94A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CABqPoBYdwqJgZEqMCtXcP7Y82tiTndLO1i_Ndj3YD61kMxPwOA@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you for the reminder! I'm +1 on today's meeting.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 9:48?AM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:

> Just a reminder this is today, since it?s not our usual week and might not
> be on people?s calendars.
>
> Eli
>
>
> Sent from mobile with limited functionality.
>
>
> Eli L Adam, PLS
>
> County Surveyor
>
> Lincoln County Surveyor's Office
> 880 NE 7th Street | Newport, OR 97365
> *eadam at co.lincoln.or.us <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>* | 541-574-1289
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
> James Klassen via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:52:48 PM
> *To:* Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>
> 1/23 works for me.
>
> No objections from me on confirming to OSGeo budget request.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:23 Dan Little via geomoose-psc <
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
> 1/23 is slightly better for me!
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41?AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
> 1/23 works for me.
>
> --
> Chris Hughes
>
> GIS Analyst
> Lincoln County GIS Department
> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
> Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>; TC Haddad <
> tchaddad at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>
> Hi Tanya,
>
> Thanks for leading on this.
>
> 1/23 works better for me than 1/16.
>
> I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget
> request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).
> I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000
> without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to
> allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are
> above the guideline so we're in good(?) company,
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think
> the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to
> projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
> TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>
>
> Happy New Year GeoMoosers,
>
> Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and
> short-turnaround items for everyone:
>
>    - *January Meeting change: *would it be ok to bump our normal PSC
>    meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5
>    Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would
>    avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.
>
>    - *Budget Revision:* it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by
>    @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in
>    keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest
>    we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can
>    be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into
>    a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.
>
> If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your
> replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to
> be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account
> for time zones.
>
> best,
> Tanya
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260123/554b8e8a/attachment.htm>

From eadam at co.lincoln.or.us  Wed Jan 28 14:42:46 2026
From: eadam at co.lincoln.or.us (Eli Adam)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 22:42:46 +0000
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items (budget followup)
In-Reply-To: <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFVrPyhjyo6_2O7EvjMN4WND0j3TA-Tx8STBaAEjvvcmRBeiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <PH0PR09MB8635083FA46C9FAB6868BC05CA82A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <BY5PR09MB4721A469AA2122A0F624B139C181A@BY5PR09MB4721.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <CABqPoBYEtpKFSZJrjPCdi1H1eB5uzKy4Km9-o7OdTbvMPFS3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHqX7963XQjCT0siUcs+xm+yf_MidnzXacr5MSTdkD2RLuYNyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <PH0PR09MB863547DEBE3E701395C38D04CA91A@PH0PR09MB8635.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>

Hi all,

It looks like the OSGeo budget is coming together, https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects

And the vote is in process, https://www.loomio.com/p/Lm4qrO2V/motion-to-approve-the-osgeo-budget-for-2026

I'll note that other projects received more than $2,000 so I suggest in future years we not conform to the stated limits.

There is also a note and question opening the possibility of $1,500 code sprint funding, "Board Note: Code Sprint planning should be asked separately following the Event Financial Guidelines (1,500 for a Code Sprint is mentioned here, is this travel cost to a code sprint?) "   This link may be the referenced Event Financial Guidelines document but I'm not sure, https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/blob/master/board/documents/osgeo_financial_guidance.pdf.

So it looks like we're on track for a $2,000 budget and maybe the possibility to request $1,500 for Code Sprint support at a later date.

Best regards, Eli



________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of James Klassen via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:52 PM
To: Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
Cc: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items

1/23 works for me.

No objections from me on confirming to OSGeo budget request.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:23 Dan Little via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
1/23 is slightly better for me!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41?AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
1/23 works for me.

--
Chris Hughes

GIS Analyst
Lincoln County GIS Department
880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
Tel: (541) 574 1283

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>; TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com<mailto:tchaddad at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items

Hi Tanya,

Thanks for leading on this.

1/23 works better for me than 1/16.

I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).  I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000 without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are above the guideline so we're in good(?) company, https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.

Best regards, Eli

________________________________
From: geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
To: GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items


Happy New Year GeoMoosers,

Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and short-turnaround items for everyone:

  *   January Meeting change: would it be ok to bump our normal PSC meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5 Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.

  *   Budget Revision: it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.

If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account for time zones.

best,
Tanya

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260128/efb1e90c/attachment-0001.htm>