[geomoose-psc] January PSC items

[James Klassen]

1/23 works for me.

No objections from me on confirming to OSGeo budget request.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:23 Dan Little via geomoose-psc <
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> 1/23 is slightly better for me!
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 9:41 AM Christopher Hughes via geomoose-psc <
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> 1/23 works for me.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hughes
>>
>> GIS Analyst
>> Lincoln County GIS Department
>> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
>> Eli Adam via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 8:27 PM
>> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>; TC Haddad <
>> tchaddad at gmail.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>>
>> Hi Tanya,
>>
>> Thanks for leading on this.
>>
>> 1/23 works better for me than 1/16.
>>
>> I'm of the opinion that you (or any PSC member) can conform the budget
>> request to OSGeo requirements (within the realm of our previous decision).
>> I'm also confident that the OSGeo Board can truncate our request to 2,000
>> without any action by us (we can react afterwards in how we plan to
>> allocate that reduced budget).  6/11 of the project requests so far are
>> above the guideline so we're in good(?) company,
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2026#OSGeo_Projects.  I think
>> the total requested so far also exceeds what will probably be allocated to
>> projects.  If you want to change it, I support that.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of
>> TC Haddad via geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:37 PM
>> *To:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Subject:* [geomoose-psc] January PSC items
>>
>>
>> Happy New Year GeoMoosers,
>>
>> Hope you all had a good holiday break! I have 2 somewhat important and
>> short-turnaround items for everyone:
>>
>>    - *January Meeting change: *would it be ok to bump our normal PSC
>>    meeting out by one week from Jan 16th to January 23rd? This January has 5
>>    Fridays, so we would be moving from the 3rd to the 4th friday.  This would
>>    avoid the friday before a long weekend, which might be useful.
>>
>>    - *Budget Revision:* it was pointed out on the Mapserver list (and by
>>    @EliL that the OSGeo budget requests should be scaled down to $2000 in
>>    keeping with a board request, and so if there are no objections, I suggest
>>    we make that change now (our original request was posted last month and can
>>    be altered up to January 15th). If you prefer that this item be bumped into
>>    a separate thread with a vote, please respond with that preference.
>>
>> If you see this email before the weekend it would be great to get your
>> replies in time to make the first change asap. The second change needs to
>> be made by Tuesday/Wednesday at the latest to be on the safe side / account
>> for time zones.
>>
>> best,
>> Tanya
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260113/e0e08e85/attachment-0001.htm>