[Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD,
which is more stable?
Brent Fraser
bfraser at geoanalytic.com
Fri Jun 24 13:15:22 EDT 2011
Just a follow-up. I also needed to add 900913 to ms4w's epsg file. I
think we need to change to the more official EPSG:3857 (is is included
with MS4W), but I don't know if OpenLayers will work with that.
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 6/16/2011 2:01 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
>
> Brent,
>
>
> Thanks for the info. PHP and POSTGIS are already configured on the
> LiveDVD, so that end should be straight forward enough. Something
> that sticks in the back of my mind though, is how to manage the
> different OS installs. The LiveDVD is using Ubuntu for example.
>
>
> I'm wondering if we don't help the process by packaging everything up
> as a single install for demo purposes, especially in the case of MS4W
> (and PHP), but I also know there are those that would prefer to
> install each piece themselves.
>
>
> I can see using a subset of the LIVEDVD for GeoMoose
> instruction/training at some point as well.
>
>
> bobb
>
>
>
>
> >>> Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com> wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> I'm a little off-topic, but I think we need to formalize our testing
> when we do a release (unfortunately I didn't have time to spend on
> v2.4 rc1).
>
> I just installed GeoMOOSE v2.4 Web Mercator Demo and MS4W on Windows
> XP with IE 8, and it failed to load the page. I had to install the
> Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable Package to get PHP to
> work, but I think that's MS4W's problem.
>
> For GeoMOOSE, I had to remove the trailing comma on line 2216 of
> compiled.js to get:
> resolutions: CONFIGURATION.scales
>
> And I had to uncomment the mapping library script includes in
> geomoose.html.
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
>
> Brent Fraser
>
>
>
> On 6/15/2011 12:05 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
>
>> Dan,
>>
>>
>> Well, the examples I was referring to, were those on the GeoMoose
>> site. Which I've had get fouled up with the navigation tools.
>> Sometimes the interface gets lost if you jump back and forth from
>> the on map controls to the top tool bar controls in the mercator demo
>> for example.
>>
>>
>> The parcel ID function in the county demo is outputting some
>> MapServer errors.
>>
>>
>> I was planning on just copying these into the Live DVD originally,
>> but they look like they need fixing, at least in the case of the
>> Parcel ID stuff.
>>
>>
>> So, should I copy them and configure for 2.4 or fix the 2.2 version?
>>
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> There is absolutely nothing in 2.2 that should work that doesn't in
>> 2.4. The code is not that different. Fix your configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>> *To:* "geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net"
>> <geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:30 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the
>> Live DVD, which is more stable?
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>>
>> That's the problem. I had to build a case to include some local
>> demos in the LIVE DVD installer ,but not everything seems to work
>> in the 2.2 stuff, so to fix, it seems better to address the same
>> capabilities in the 2.4 version instead of repairing the 2.2 demos.
>>
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ugh... Yeah, GM2.4 has a ton of fixes that are reasonably
>> important. Especially when you take it away from the demo
>> configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>> *To:* geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:24 AM
>> *Subject:* [Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the
>> Live DVD, which is more stable?
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> in your estimation (of those that have used GM2.4, would you
>> think that 2.4 is more or as stable as GM2.2?
>>
>>
>> It has been suggested that using GM2.2 for the LiveDVD may be
>> better than going with a newer version.
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced
>> content
>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline
>> Image
>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility
>> Checking.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> <mailto:Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> <mailto:Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
>>
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>
>>
>> Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110624/5c306b62/attachment.html
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list