[Geomoose-users] Data licensing discussion (yep OSGeo incubation again)

[Jody Garnett]

(Just taking this conversation back to the GeoMoOOSE list)

For incubation we don't mind what you do exactly; only that you are aware of what data you are distributing. As I said we try not to mess with what is already working ...

Personally I would check the text with OpenMNND project to see if they care what it says; and perhaps thanks the OpenMNND project for the data.

"GeoMOOSE would like to thank the OpenMNND project and Dakota County, MN for supplying the parcel sample data. This data is provided for testing and demonstration purposes only. All attributes have been changed to provide anonymity and none can be deemed reliable or accurate."

Of course if I was doing it I would try and be funny:

"This test data is deemed a work of fiction. Any resmblence to Dakota County is purely as a result of the OpenMNND project kindly supplying GeoMOOSE with sample data. All attributes have been changed to provided anonymity and cannot be deemed reliable or accurate. Especially the unicorn farm on the north end of town"

But then again my joyful attitude keeps me from going far in life :-)

Jody


On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 1:33 AM, Dan Little wrote:

> Would this wording be appropriate:
> 
> 
> """
> Parcel data originally provided to GeoMOOSE through the OpenMNND project by Dakota County, MN.
> 
> All attributes have been changed to provide anonymity and none can be deemed reliable or accurate.
> 
> This data is provided for testing and demonstration purposes only.
> """"
> 
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120419/404d6ad2/attachment-0001.html