[Geomoose-users] RFC-2, motion
Eli Adam
eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
Mon Apr 23 00:51:32 EDT 2012
Jim and Bob,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, in that light it might just be cleaner to strike the "similar to
> MapServer's" line. MapServer doesn't really justify why we need a mission
> statement.
>
>
Good idea. I removed that.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>wrote:
>
>> Eli,
>>
>> The only comment I have a couple of slight comments, about the
>> reference to MapServer. Seems like this is out of place in here for some
>> reason. Maybe expanding that comment to include the other open source
>> projects that are included and how they might be similarly administered.
>> the refence to ". . . the website as a representation . . .", might this
>> be better with a link to the actual website (due to possible replication of
>> the page?), to something like " . . . . the website (geomoose.org) as a
>> representation . . ."
>>
>>
Good point, I added a link. If the changes aren't visible on the website,
both are here, http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/changeset/763/
I also changed the status to proposed. I'll start the voting on the motion:
+1
Eli
> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> RFC-2 is available for review. Voice your thoughts in the next
>> few days. I'll change the status to proposed and call for a vote next
>> week.
>>
>> http://geomoose.org/trunk/rfc/rfc-2.html
>>
>> Regards, Eli
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120422/2f1ac6b5/attachment.html
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list