[Geomoose-users] PSC: Roadmap meeting

[James Klassen]

I agree with Dan.  (Happy now Eli?)

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I think 4 should be sufficient.  I'm not sure I could commit to an 8-hour
> day.  (4 with a follow up 4 is more practical for me.)
>
> We could also host a MN effort and tap into WebEx for Eli and Brent.
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
> *To:* "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>; "
> geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org" <geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 30, 2012 12:48 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Geomoose-users] PSC: Roadmap meeting
>
> I suggest a doodle poll to coordinate the time.  I don't have a preference
> on length, although 4 seems like it should be sufficient assuming we can
> keep things moving along and make some decisions.  Houston Engineering
> could host if people want to drive to our office for the MN locals.
>
> Brian Fischer, CFM
> Principal | GIS Project Manager
> Houston Engineering, Inc.
> O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 12:00 PM
> To: geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [Geomoose-users] PSC: Roadmap meeting
>
> PSC,
>
> At the PSC monthly meeting, we raised a few things which need further
> discussion and decision.  Things like: build system type and necessity, how
> extensions are done, upgrade to Dojo 1.7 and AMD-style class definitions,
> versioning, test suite, additional configuration parameters, selection
> interaction, etc.  Also perhaps review some of the decisions and good
> progress we've made since the F2F at FOSS4G 2011.
>
> Plus any other big items people have.
>
> I think that we should probably set up a lengthy block of time for this.
> F2F may be beneficial which would obviously be in MN, however, Brent and I
> probably won't make that so someone at the F2F will have to commit to a
> substantial communication effort to include us with active irc/phone.
>
> What are your date/time availabilities?  Should we doodle poll for date?
> Is 4 hours the right amount on time?  8 with lunch?
>
> Your response is required by Aug 5th.
>
> Thanks, Eli
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120802/4a95a08b/attachment.html>