[Geomoose-users] RFC-3: Release Process

[Brian Fischer]

I would agree.  I think it is the way to go.

Brian Fischer, CFM
Principal | GIS Project Manager
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734

From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of James Klassen
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:58 PM
To: geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [Geomoose-users] RFC-3: Release Process

What is the opinion on the list of following http://semver.org/ for our version numbers (starting with 2.6.0)?

I think we are more or less doing this already, but this would make it a little more formal and gives people a better idea of what to expect from an upgrade.

The biggest part is we need to define exactly of what our public API consists.  We have a start at this with the GeoMOOSE.* namespace, but there are other parts that we should consider too like the mapbook and the service protocols.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120629/2304e98f/attachment.html>