[Geomoose-users] hunting down code review email discussion

[Jody Garnett]

So the initial feedback is that although GeoMoose is doing the work we need to put a bit of effort into packaging this up for the incubation committee to review. 

Feedback from incubation list:
- Cameron: The following page needs updating to point to Provenance Review page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Status#Code_Copyright_Review
- Cameron: I'd also like to see "Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines" embedded into a "Software Developers Guide" or similar. I'm afraid the link to meeting minutes doesn't constitute guidelines.

Current docs:
- http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Status
- http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Provenance_Review <-- please fill in, mostly links to email discussion
- http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Checklist <-- please fill in, mostly links to email discussion

-- 
Jody Garnett


On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 8:55 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:

> Morning All: 
> 
> Bob asked if a separate "Provenance Review Document" document was required, or if links to the discussion thread would be sufficient.
> I think we can do email links, followed any issue raised.
> 
> However I have had a hard time finding all the appropriate links myself, with that in mind I have started the following wiki page - so we can collect them together.
> 
> * http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Provenance_Review
> 
> -- 
> Jody Garnett
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120924/24976baa/attachment.html>