[Geomoose-users] geocode address 2.6 RC1 status
Johan Forsman
Johan.Forsman at LA.GOV
Tue Jun 4 05:33:14 PDT 2013
I might be a tad late to the party here, but I just now took a stab at investigating this issue because I need the geocode function.
Using Firebug I inspected the request sent by the geocoder function and noticed the URL looked really off, and when I took the URL and trimmed out the "off-looking" bits I received good results. I also noticed it was a POST request, and the previous GM version used a GET request.
I saw a post in a discussion forum regarding the Google geocoder, which mentioned that POST requests are automatically urlencoded.
In geocode.php, around line 40 (count may be less as I added the debug bits at the top) there is this instruction:
$request_url = $url . "&q=" . urlencode($streetaddress);
I changed the line to read
$request_url = $url . "&q=" . $streetaddress;
which appears to allow the geocoder to function as in previous versions.
Take care,
Johan.
From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mark Volz
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:40 AM
To: geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [Geomoose-users] geocode address 2.6 RC1 status
Hello,
I noticed that Geocoding addresses does not appear to work out of the box for Geomoose 2.6 RC1. Has anyone else noticed any problems?
Mark Volz
GIS Specialist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20130604/b0d4a330/attachment.html>
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list