[Geomoose-users] Catalog Groups in 2.7.1

[TC Haddad]

Ah - so I never bumped into the bug in #8 because my multiples were always
nested. Hmmmm.

thanks,

T

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I did suggest as such in my commit message... ESP.
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I wonder if this is (unintentional?) fallout from
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose-js/commit/44df402cb7845964f1e2fe7209003a267703bcdd
>>
>> ?
>> On Nov 24, 2014 11:08 AM, "TC Haddad" <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm migrating an app from 2.6.1 to 2.7.1, and I'm trying to figure out
>>> how the catalog groups seem to have changed.
>>>
>>> I used to be able to do this:
>>>
>>> <group title="Base Maps"  multiple="false">
>>>          <group title="Street Maps" multiple="false">
>>>                    ....
>>>           </group>
>>>           <group title="Aerials" multiple="false">
>>>                    ....
>>>            </group>
>>> </group>
>>>
>>> And this used to allow all my options to be in the same "multiple=false"
>>> pool, with only one base map of any type selectable at a time.
>>>
>>> The behavior I see now is that only the inner-most  "multiple=false" is
>>> being used, meaning a user can pick one Street Map option and one Arial
>>> option, and both options can be on at once (i.e it is like the outer
>>> "multiple=false" is being ignored).
>>>
>>> Is there something I am missing to reproduce the old behavior?
>>>
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20141124/50bb0abf/attachment.html>