[Geomoose-users] Mutual exclusion & tarball "errors"

[James Klassen]

I'm not sure what happened with the geomoose-2.7.tar.gz file.  That file
as it is on the server isn't what is produced from the build scripts.  I
re-ran the build scripts and made geomoose-2.7.0.tar.gz and updated the
link on the download page.

It looks like that tarball is some strange mix of the git tree (which
was reorganized for 2.7) and the distribution tarball (which should be
the same structure as in 2.6).

1) maps shouldn't be nested
2) php should be a directory in htdocs (not a symlink)
3) services shouldn't exist in the tarball (it does exist in git)
4) htdocs/js should just be htdocs.

On 2014/10/13, 12:43 AM, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Geomoose and find it really great, got it working and have something
> to say about it.
>
> For apache conf, I got Geomoose fully working using a different alias
> "Alias /geomoose/ /srv/geomoose/htdocs/js/" instead of 
> "Alias /geomoose/ /srv/geomoose/htdocs/"
>
> and Google layers weren't working with the first one.
> Is it correct to have both working and what's the difference between the twos?
>
> Furthermore I had to adjust the php symlink from "php -> ../services/php" to
> "php -> ../php" because services dir doesn't exist in the tarball tree.
>
> The tarball contains two identical "maps" dir nested into each other, is this correct?
> (here follows the output of tree)
> geomoose/
> ├── maps   <==================
> │   ├── demo
> │   ├── development
> │   ├── fonts
> │   ├── maps   <==================
> │   │   ├── demo
> │   │   ├── development
> │   │   ├── fonts
> │   │   └── symbols
> │   └── symbols
>
>
> My last is a feature request: a mutual exclusion overlay layer list would be very
> appreciated. 
> Sometimes you don't want some overlay layers to be visible at the same time, just like
> background layers.
>
> Regards
> /raffaele
>
>