[Geomoose-users] RFC #5
Eli Adam
eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
Wed Dec 2 17:30:24 PST 2015
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
> For those feeling TL;DR or "Too much developer chatter":
>
> We are folding all of the various geomoose query services
> (specifically, select, identify and query) into a single service that
> is based around a single "Service" class from which all new services
> can inherit. Also, after that transition is complete, we will be
> adding additional support for a table and vector results view of the
> data. The latter of which has been available only in customized
> versions of GeoMOOSE to this point.
>
> For reference:
> - http://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-5.html
>
> This has been a long time coming and has made some substantial
> progress in the last couple of weeks. For those that are interested
> in the nitty-gritty of the implementation you can see the progress
> here:
>
> - https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose-services/tree/rfc5
Nice to see all the progress here! It has been very informative to
read up on some of the commits.
Thanks, Eli
>
> The documentation for the initial code pushes are being placed here:
>
> - https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/issues/60
>
> My hope is to put more of this into separate tickets. I did want to
> get all of the old tests passing before I started moving to expanding
> functionality. There is also some notable missing bits:
> 1. Custom header/footer template support is not there. Query.php
> didn't support that functionality but select did. I will be adding
> that.
> 2. "saving results" ala select.php is not supported yet. Results
> return and a highlight layer functions but it will be constantly
> requerying the data. Caching data in the SQLite database allowed for
> less overhead on servers. Is this still a thing we need? Or can we
> assume modern servers can handle a parcel query fast enough to just
> requery the data when redrawing the map?
> 3. Table rendering still doesn't have a UI component solution.
> Neither does a Table/Map relational model (IE, highlight something on
> the map and get something on the table to show up). This isn't rocket
> science to figure out but the application as of now is missing all of
> those interactions.
>
> Thanks everyone!
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list