[Geomoose-users] documentation ideas

[Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)]

All,

I agree it’s confusing on it’s own, but if there were more than one server package configuration to look at it wouldn’t seem as mysterious.  I was planning ahead somewhat, with the eventual idea that more of these simple diagrams might appear over time.

Should a bare minimum approach to having a running GeoMOOSE be taken then in the diagram.  Also, what would the bare minimum look like?

Need APACHE (or ISS) obviously, and . . 

I can put more detail in into the diagram related to MS4W specifically vs an option where Apache/PHP are installed separately.

bobb


> On Dec 23, 2015, at 7:15 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the wording about MS4W is out of place and maybe even confusing.  If you install MS4W then Apache and PHP aren't optional -- they come with the package -- and if someone /just/ installed GeoMOOSE they aren't necessarily going to understand that MS4w is optional in and of itself.  They either (a) had the wherewithal to install it on their platform of choice or (b) installed it from MS4W.  Either way putting the "optional framework" stuff on there could cloud the user's impressions.