[Geomoose-users] GeoMoose 3 - Speed

[Dan Little]

I was going to suggest tracking down the issues with the mapfile. We
actually did some initial benchmarking in GM2 vs GM3 development and there
are a lot of code paths that actually ended up faster. But I do admit
sometimes the data transfer + parsing can make a service call feel less
responsive.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:47 PM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Is there a reprojection happening in your 3.x setup that wasn't happening
> in your 2.x setup?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:56 AM Christopher Hughes <
> chughes at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
>> I'm using WMS for display and WFS for queries. The surveys dataset I
>> mentioned is connecting to a postgis server,
>> whereas the rest of my data are in shapefiles on the same server. Looking
>> at shp2img it looks like it's in the drawing
>> of the layer rather than in the web service.
>>
>> Shp2img results:
>> -msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (Surveys), 0.043s             -    using mapfile
>> from geomoose 2
>> -msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (Surveys), 7.219s             -    using mapfile
>> from geomoose 3
>>
>> Although that kind of points to my mapfile configuration. I'll continue
>> debugging.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:36 PM James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How are you loading the data in GeoMoose 3?  In GeoMoose 2 I'm guessing
>>> it was via WMS.
>>>
>>> Where are you seeing the bottleneck?  The web service or inside GeoMoose
>>> proper?
>>>
>>> Generally speaking...
>>>
>>> If you are using WMS then load times should be similar.
>>>
>>> If you are using WFS it might be faster or slower on initial load
>>> depending on the amount of vector data transfered.  I think GeoMoose will
>>> pass a bounding box to the WFS server so if you zoom in first it might
>>> help.  It should be faster than GeoMoose 2 on interactions after initial
>>> data load.
>>>
>>>
>>> GeoMoose 3 also supports using a WMS layer for display but a WFS later
>>> for query.  That might help the initial load times.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 15:27 Christopher Hughes <chughes at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any advice on how to improve data rendering speeds for
>>>> GeoMoose 3?
>>>>
>>>> I'm having some issues loading vector data quickly, although our
>>>> imagery does also load a
>>>> bit slower than in our GeoMoose 2 website. I'm on Windows but it
>>>> doesn't appear to be
>>>> inherently a Windows vs Linux issue. I can load our surveys dataset
>>>> with GeoMoose 2
>>>> in around 2 seconds, but when I switch to GeoMoose 3, the same dataset
>>>> on the same server
>>>> takes around 10 seconds to load.
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed that the services run very quickly. I can search or select
>>>> data about as quickly
>>>> as on GeoMoose 2, but when it comes to then zooming to results and
>>>> rendering the data
>>>> there's a significant lag, even when comparing GeoMoose 2 and 3 when on
>>>> the same Windows
>>>> server.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any suggestions,
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Hughes
>>>>
>>>> GIS Analyst
>>>> Lincoln County Surveyor Department
>>>> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>>>> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hughes
>>
>> GIS Analyst
>> Lincoln County Surveyor Department
>> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20200202/1fee19e9/attachment.html>