[Geomoose-users] GeoMoose 3 - Speed

Mon Feb 3 08:18:19 PST 2020

I'm using an older version of mapserver on this server for geomoose 2
(which is the one rendering faster).
I am reprojecting to our local coordinate system which I didn't have to do
for geomoose 2. Perhaps I have my extent coordinates wrong.

Chris

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 10:54 AM Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
wrote:

> Chris,
>
>
>
> Are you using the same MS4W version for both applications?  If not see
> what MapServer version each is using and check to make sure you have
> indexes built for both on the data source.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>   *Brian Fischer *
> {Title}
> Houston Engineering, Inc.
> *O* 763.493.4522 | *D* 763.493.6664 | *C *763.229.2734
>    7550 Meridian Circle North, Suite 120
> Maple Grove, MN • 55369
> *www.houstoneng.com* <http://www.houstoneng.com/>
> Follow us: Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/houstoneng> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/houstoneng> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/houston-engineering-inc.> | YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/HoustonEngInc>
>
> This entire message (including all forwards and replies) and any
> attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret, work-product,
> attorney-client or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Geomoose-users <geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Dan Little
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 2, 2020 12:12 PM
> *To:* TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* geomoose-users at mail.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Geomoose-users] GeoMoose 3 - Speed
>
>
>
> *[External Email]*
> ------------------------------
>
> I was going to suggest tracking down the issues with the mapfile. We
> actually did some initial benchmarking in GM2 vs GM3 development and there
> are a lot of code paths that actually ended up faster. But I do admit
> sometimes the data transfer + parsing can make a service call feel less
> responsive.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:47 PM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there a reprojection happening in your 3.x setup that wasn't happening
> in your 2.x setup?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:56 AM Christopher Hughes <
> chughes at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
> I'm using WMS for display and WFS for queries. The surveys dataset I
> mentioned is connecting to a postgis server,
>
> whereas the rest of my data are in shapefiles on the same server. Looking
> at shp2img it looks like it's in the drawing
>
> of the layer rather than in the web service.
>
>
>
> Shp2img results:
>
> -msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (Surveys), 0.043s             -    using mapfile
> from geomoose 2
>
> -msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (Surveys), 7.219s             -    using mapfile
> from geomoose 3
>
>
>
> Although that kind of points to my mapfile configuration. I'll continue
> debugging.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:36 PM James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> How are you loading the data in GeoMoose 3?  In GeoMoose 2 I'm guessing it
> was via WMS.
>
>
>
> Where are you seeing the bottleneck?  The web service or inside GeoMoose
> proper?
>
>
>
> Generally speaking...
>
>
>
> If you are using WMS then load times should be similar.
>
>
>
> If you are using WFS it might be faster or slower on initial load
> depending on the amount of vector data transfered.  I think GeoMoose will
> pass a bounding box to the WFS server so if you zoom in first it might
> help.  It should be faster than GeoMoose 2 on interactions after initial
> data load.
>
>
>
>
>
> GeoMoose 3 also supports using a WMS layer for display but a WFS later for
> query.  That might help the initial load times.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 15:27 Christopher Hughes <chughes at co.lincoln.or.us>
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any advice on how to improve data rendering speeds for
> GeoMoose 3?
>
>
>
> I'm having some issues loading vector data quickly, although our imagery
> does also load a
>
> bit slower than in our GeoMoose 2 website. I'm on Windows but it doesn't
> appear to be
>
> inherently a Windows vs Linux issue. I can load our surveys dataset with
> GeoMoose 2
>
> in around 2 seconds, but when I switch to GeoMoose 3, the same dataset on
> the same server
>
> takes around 10 seconds to load.
>
>
>
> I've noticed that the services run very quickly. I can search or select
> data about as quickly
>
> as on GeoMoose 2, but when it comes to then zooming to results and
> rendering the data
>
> there's a significant lag, even when comparing GeoMoose 2 and 3 when on
> the same Windows
>
> server.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any suggestions,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Hughes
>
>
>
> GIS Analyst
>
> Lincoln County Surveyor Department
>
> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>
> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Hughes
>
>
>
> GIS Analyst
>
> Lincoln County Surveyor Department
>
> 880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
>
> Tel: (541) 574 1283
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users

-- 
Chris Hughes

GIS Analyst
Lincoln County Surveyor Department
880 NE 7th St. l Newport, OR 97365
Tel: (541) 574 1283
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20200203/b5018a1a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hei_d562a228-8e53-424d-8c69-43b1a222b74e.png
Type: image/png
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20200203/b5018a1a/attachment-0001.png>