[GeoNode-devel] should we hide ResourceBase in the admin?

Paolo Corti pcorti at gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 01:44:19 PDT 2015


Ah ok, I didn't realize that is already like this.
Then is fine to me :)

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Simone Dalmasso
<simone.dalmasso at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes but the resourcebase record is already in the children. From a layer in
> the admin you get all the information of its resourcebase too.
>
> 2015-04-16 10:32 GMT+02:00 Paolo Corti <pcorti at gmail.com>:
>>
>> -1, as I think the admin app is intended for administrative users, and
>> they should have a full view of the database.
>> As an alternative approach, we could have the resource base record
>> included in the related layer/document/map admin page.
>> It should be pretty easy to customize the admin to get this behavior
>> cheers
>> p
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Simone Dalmasso
>> <simone.dalmasso at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > There is not full consensus on this so I'd like to know others opinion
>> >
>> > It's redundant as all those info are in the children,
>> > it's confusing because there is no reference in the ResourceBase about
>> > the
>> > child so it's very hard to understand what it is
>> > it is not the right place where to change metadata
>> > for most ResourceBase is not very meaningful
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simone
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > geonode-devel mailing list
>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paolo Corti
>> Geospatial software developer
>> web: http://www.paolocorti.net
>> twitter: @capooti
>> skype: capooti
>
>
>
>
> --
> Simone



-- 
Paolo Corti
Geospatial software developer
web: http://www.paolocorti.net
twitter: @capooti
skype: capooti


More information about the geonode-devel mailing list