[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

[Alessio Fabiani]

The GeoNode 2.4.x branch should use the geoserver-geonode-ext 2.4.x branch
using the 2.7-SNAPSHOT version of GeoServer.

I also propose to get the occasion of releasing a GeoNode 2.4.1 using
GeoServer 2.7.5. Not only because the GeoServer 2.7.5 will be release in
few days, but also because there are some very important fix and
improvements that we should include in this release. In particular:

 - GeoNode fix for this https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/issues/2337
 - GeoServer fix for the Importer which is not thread-safe on the 2.7.4
release

Moreover the GeoNode master should be switched to GeoServer 2.8-SNAPSHOT.
About this, who is responsible for the releases of GeoGig plugins? I can
also volunteer onm this, but I need access and also some pointers on how to
work on those projects that I don't know right now.



==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==

Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:     +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39  331 6233686

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I believe this is a good idea too.
>
> -a
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have for
>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and 2.5.
>>
>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Patrick Dufour
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geonode-devel mailing list
>> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/40f37fef/attachment.html>