[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

Wed Dec 2 07:28:08 PST 2015

+1 with even odd.

2015-12-02 16:26 GMT+01:00 Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>:

> Patrick,
>
> What I understood is that it means less alpha/beta/rc craze and just
> knowing that the 2.5.x releases would be 'development' and should not be
> used in production.
>
> -a
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > By even/odd, do you mean bug fixes would be,
>> >
>> > 2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.4.5, 2.4.7, etc.
>> >
>> > And that the stable releases will be:
>> >
>> > 2.6.0, 2.8.0, 2.10.0, 2.12.0, etc.
>> >
>> > Or some other sequence.
>> >
>> > In regards, to the top number, I'd vote to stay on 2.x.x for a while and
>> > only migrate to 3.x.x when there's a massive change.
>> >
>> > On Dec 2, 2015 9:57 AM, "Paolo Corti" <pcorti at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 for even/odd and for 2.4.1 release
>> >> cheers
>> >> p
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alessio Fabiani
>> >> <alessio.fabiani at geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>> >> > It should not, the GeoServer version is the same train. There can be
>> an
>> >> > issue if the users run a "paver setup" command maybe, which (as far
>> as I
>> >> > remember) deletes the GeoServer Data Dir.
>> >> >
>> >> > ==
>> >> > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> >> > http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
>> >> > ==
>> >> >
>> >> > Ing. Alessio Fabiani
>> >> > @alfa7691
>> >> > Founder/Technical Lead
>> >> >
>> >> > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> >> > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>> >> > 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> >> > Italy
>> >> > phone: +39 0584 962313
>> >> > fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>> >> > mob:   +39 331 6233686
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> >> > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>> >> >
>> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>> >> >
>> >> > Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica
>> e/o
>> >> > nel/i
>> >> > file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>> loro
>> >> > utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>> per
>> >> > le
>> >> > finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>> >> > messaggio
>> >> > senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene
>> >> > notizia
>> >> > via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
>> >> > cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>> >> > divulgarlo
>> >> > anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>> utilizzarlo
>> >> > per
>> >> > finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi
>> >> > dettati
>> >> > dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended
>> solely
>> >> > for
>> >> > the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be
>> confidential
>> >> > or
>> >> > proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>> >> > (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data
>> Protection
>> >> > Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure,
>> >> > reproduction,
>> >> > copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or
>> partial,
>> >> > is
>> >> > strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>> >> > addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>> >> > immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>> >> > information in this message that has been received in error. The
>> sender
>> >> > does
>> >> > not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>> >> > completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for
>> changes
>> >> > made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result
>> of
>> >> > e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ariel Nunez <
>> ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does
>> not
>> >> >> wipe out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have
>> tested
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> with the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
>> >> >> geoserver-geonode debian package.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there
>> seemed
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received
>> >> >> formal
>> >> >> voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against
>> it
>> >> >> or
>> >> >> support or should we do that in a github issue?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -a
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in
>> favor,
>> >> >>> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
>> >> >>> direction.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <
>> tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using
>> the
>> >> >>> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable
>> >> >>> > release
>> >> >>> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > ..Tom
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > [1]
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
>> >> >>> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >> >>> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> -a
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour
>> >> >>> >> <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like
>> we
>> >> >>> >>> have
>> >> >>> >>> for
>> >> >>> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support
>> 2.4
>> >> >>> >>> and
>> >> >>> >>> 2.5.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code
>> sprint,
>> >> >>> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Regards,
>> >> >>> >>> Patrick Dufour
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> > geonode-devel mailing list
>> >> >>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> >>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> geonode-devel mailing list
>> >> >> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > geonode-devel mailing list
>> >> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Paolo Corti
>> >> Geospatial software developer
>> >> web: http://www.paolocorti.net
>> >> twitter: @capooti
>> >> skype: capooti
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> geonode-devel mailing list
>> >> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > geonode-devel mailing list
>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> geonode-devel mailing list
>> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
>


-- 
Simone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/d7cde694/attachment.html>