[geos-devel] Issues with relate not handling GeometryCollections?

[Martin Davis]

Yeah, me too.  Sigh...

Martin Davis, Senior Technical Specialist
Vivid Solutions Inc.
Suite #1A-2328 Government Street   Victoria, B.C.   V8T 5G5
Phone: (250) 385 6040    Fax: (250) 385 6046
EMail: mbdavis at vividsolutions.com  Web: www.vividsolutions.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: chodgson at refractions.net [mailto:chodgson at refractions.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:43 AM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: RE: [geos-devel] Issues with relate not handling
> GeometryCollections?
> 
> 
> Union semantics are certainly what I (an admitted 2nd-class 
> geometryologist) 
> would expect.
> 
> Chris
> 
> > Good point, though, that the percentage of cases which 
> really are incorrect
> > will be very low.  My original question was "What is the appropriate
> > semantics?"  If there is a strong answer of "union 
> semantics", then it may be
> > worth implementing this even if a few times it's going to be wrong.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at geos.refractions.net
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>