[geos-devel] Failures in testLeaksBig.xml

[strk]

On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:42:20AM -0700, Martin Davis wrote:
> I checked out the 5 failures in the testLeaksBig.xml file.  They're all
> spurious, and due to the fact that JTS 1.4 now allows repeated points in
> geometries, as per the SFS spec.
> 
> So these don't indicate any problem with GEOS.  You should fix up your
> testLeaksBig.xml file to change the results of those cases to "true".

Thank you Martin.
I've fixed the 'expected' result and added testLeaksBig.cml file
to the source/test directory in CVS.

--strk;

> 
> Martin Davis, Senior Technical Architect
> Vivid Solutions Inc.
> Suite #1A-2328 Government Street Victoria, B.C. V8T 5G5
> Phone: (250) 385 6040 - Local 308 Fax: (250) 385 6046
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: strk [mailto:strk at keybit.net] 
> > Sent: May 17, 2004 5:55 AM
> > To: geos-devel at geos.refractions.net; Paul Ramsey
> > Subject: Re: [geos-devel] Current status
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 02:32:41PM +0200, strk wrote:
> > > I've fixed a but in PrecisionModel::makePrecise().
> > > Now the testLeaksBig.xml test gives the same result in both jts-1.4 
> > > and geos CVS (5 isValid failures).
> > > 
> > > I've also run with success all jts-1.4 tests in 
> > test/validate. Tests 
> > > in test/vivid with failures are:
> > > 	TestFunctionPLPrec.xml
> > > 	TestSimple.xml
> > > 	TestValid.xml
> > > 	TestValid2-big.xml
> > > 	TestValid2.xml
> > > 	TestWithinDistance.xml
> > > Other tests succeed.
> > 
> > Good news: the detected failures were due to bugs in the XML 
> > parser. No more failures. All JTS-1.4 tests run with success. 
> > The 5 isValid failures of testLeaksBig might be errors in the 
> > XML itself... Martin ?
> > 
> > --strk;
> > 
> > > 
> > > --strk;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:46:42PM +0200, strk wrote:
> > > > I've got doc/example to run with no leaks.
> > > > Now it's time to get results correct.
> > > > 
> > > > In particular here are a the issues I'll approach next:
> > > > 
> > > > 	o  check for leaks with runs against .xml
> > > > 
> > > > 	o  doc/example catches "side location conflict"
> > > > 	   TopologyExceptions is it an expected behaviour ?
> > > > 
> > > > 	o  Every attempt to compute a buffer with original
> > > > 	   precision (bufferOriginalPrecision) results in a
> > > > 	   "depth mismatch" exception.
> > > > 
> > > > 	o  Buffered geoms starts and end with a point 
> > > > 	   from the original geometry.
> > > > 
> > > > --strk;
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > geos-devel mailing list
> > > > geos-devel at geos.refractions.net 
> > > > http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > geos-devel mailing list
> > geos-devel at geos.refractions.net 
> > http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at geos.refractions.net
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel