[geos-devel] geos-2.2.0 / FreeBSD 4
Benjamin Thelen
bt at ccgis.de
Mon Jan 9 06:05:48 EST 2006
Hello,
Ups, sorry, my fault. I've been so busy with this, that I mistakenly
assumed that you of course know what I'm talking about :-). Sorry.
Building geos-2.2.1 fails on FreeBSD 4.11 (gcc-2.95) with this error:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
.
.
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../source/headers
-I../../source/headers/geos -I../../source/headers -DGEOS_VERSION=2.2.1
-g -O2 -c ../io/WKBReader.cpp -Wp,-MD,.deps/WKBReader.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC
-o .libs/WKBReader.o
../io/WKBReader.cpp: In function `static class ostream &
geos::WKBReader::printHEX(istream &, ostream &)':
../io/WKBReader.cpp:27: syntax error before `::'
../io/WKBReader.cpp:46: `fl' undeclared (first use this function)
../io/WKBReader.cpp:46: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../io/WKBReader.cpp:46: for each function it appears in.)
gmake[2]: *** [WKBReader.lo] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/data/src/geos-2.2.1/source/geom'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/data/src/geos-2.2.1/source'
gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you need to have more information, please let me know!
Any idea?
Kind Regards,
Ben
strk at refractions.net schrieb:
> If you are more specific on what's wrong we *might* help.
> --strk;
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:52:55AM +0100, Benjamin Thelen wrote:
>
>>Hello list,
>>
>>I've just subscribed to the geos-devel list in order to ask what it's
>>about geos > 2.1.4 (which succesfully builds on FreeBSD4) on FreeBSD4
>>and saw that the responsible FreeBSD portmaintainer has already been
>>asking there. But to be honest, I did't get the conclusion, whether you
>>or he is working on a solution or whether there already is a solution or
>>whether there is just no.
>>
>>I've just tried to build 2.2.0, 2.2.1 using gcc-3.4, but without success.
>>
>>What's the status, will there be a solution or a workaround? This would
>>really be great! I'd really appreciate any information.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at geos.refractions.net
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
More information about the geos-devel
mailing list