[geos-devel] GeometryFactory - call for explanation

[strk at refractions.net]

All three assumptions are correct.
I'd add in (1) that each instance MUST have a GeometryFactory
assigned.
--strk;

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 03:09:41AM +0200, Mateusz Å?oskot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could anyone explain/confirm me assumptions behind
> the GeometryFactory class?
> Depending on its semantic I'd have some proposal to refactor it.
> Here are my qusetions:
> 
> Are following assumptions correct?
> 
> 1. Ever instance of Geometry type (or its subtype) can have assigned its
> own instance of GeometryFactory
> 
> 2. One instance of GeometryFactory class can be shared (assigned to)
> between more than one objects of Geometry class
> 
> 3. It is not assumed that all geometries share the same
> common instance of GeometryFactory
> 
> Thanks in advance for comments
> Cheers
> -- 
> Mateusz Łoskot
> http://mateusz.loskot.net
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at geos.refractions.net
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

-- 

 /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 \ /    Respect for low technology.
  X     Keep e-mail messages readable by any computer system.
 / \    Keep it ASCII.