[geos-devel] Open issues

[Markus Schaber]

Hi, Strk,

strk at refractions.net wrote:
> Have you tried runnign an already compiled postgis (compiled
> against 2.2.3) with this new version of the CAPI ?
> Have you tried *building* postgis against this new version 
> of the CAPI ?

I'll do so as soon as I find enough time.

> (the first 3 warnings seems actually good to me, the last one
> haven't looked at more closely, but seems related to the wrong
> 'constness' we gave (to pointer instead of to object pointed to))

Looking closer, I also think that those warnings are not so scary any
more, and that it might be possible to write clients that compile to
both 2.2.X and 3.0.0 without any warnings.

HTH,
Markus


-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20061101/e2548c09/signature.bin