[geos-devel] 3.0.2

[Chris Hodgson]

Is this why some projects do RCs? ;)

3.0.1RC1, 3.0.1RC2, 3.0.1RC3?

Or was Frank only suggesting this for the 3.1.0 level of release?

Would these little issues happening in an RC-release cause less problems 
for packagers? At least it would save us the "version creep" (if we care).

I'm sure the last thing Paul needs is another person nitpicking the 
release process... but I wanted to throw my 2c in.

Chris

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Onward, to 3.0.3!
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Adam Mercer <ramercer at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:51, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> Release with libtool updated to 1.5.26
>>>       
>> When untarred this produces a directory called geos-3.0.1.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> geos-devel mailing list
>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>