[geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do

[Obe, Regina]

Paul,

Actually which patch are you referring to.  The version one or the big patch.  I just redownloaded the msvc80 folder from svn that has your version patch and then reapplied Sanak's patch and didn't run into any conflicts.

Only problem is now it reads 3.0.2 (well its hard-coded but I guess there is not much we can do about that).  I assume we'll change this yet again when we release 3.0.3.

Is it because the patch includes new files for the SVN geostest that is causing part of the problem.  If that's the case - if I gave you the patch as 2 separate patches, would that help out?

I would gladly try to help you out if I had commit access.

Thanks,
Regina





-----Original Message-----
From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 11:41 PM
To: GEOS Development List
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do
 
I couldn't apply this patch cleanly, could someone else try?

P.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Sanak <geosanak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I had added geostest project to msvc80 solution file.
> Please see the attach
> file(geos-branches-3.0-build-msvc80_add_geostest.patch).
> geostest.vcproj will generate capi/test.out.
>
> I think that the cause of difference between generated test.out and
> test.expected is precision of floating point, but I don't know details.
>
> And another Visual C++ specific problem may be capi
> version.(capi/geos_c.h.in)
> ---
> Index: geos_c.h.in
> ===================================================================
> --- geos_c.h.in    (revision 2208)
> +++ geos_c.h.in    (working copy)
> @@ -51,9 +51,9 @@
>  #if defined(_MSC_VER)
>  #include <geos/version.h>
>  #define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION_MAJOR 1
> -#define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION_MINOR 3
> +#define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION_MINOR 4
>  #define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION_PATCH 3
> -#define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION "3.0.0rc4-CAPI-1.3.3"
> +#define GEOS_CAPI_VERSION "3.0.3-CAPI-1.4.3"
>  #else
>  #define GEOS_VERSION_MAJOR @VERSION_MAJOR@
>  #define GEOS_VERSION_MINOR @VERSION_MINOR@
> ---
>
> Regards,
>
> 2008/10/24 Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
>>
>> Obe, Regina wrote:
>>>
>>> I know Frank already tested on Visual C++ Express (which is basically
>>> Visual 2008 Express) and got some test fail errors.  Do we have a solution
>>> file for that (or would people just use the msvc80 solution file for that if
>>> they wanted to use a solution) .
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> Running regression tests using geos_unitd.exe...
>>> ===============================
>>>  GEOS Test Suite Application
>>> ===============================
>>> capi::GEOSCoordSeq: ..... 5
>>> capi::GEOSSimplify: . 1
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would note that I wasn't running geos_unitd.exe, I ran geostest.exe
>> against capi/test.wkt and compared to capi/test.expected.  If I get
>> back to my windows build I'll look into the geos_unitd.exe which I wasn't
>> aware of.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>>
>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
>> warmerdam at pobox.com
>> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geos-devel mailing list
>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel







-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20081024/b0a953b5/attachment.html