[geos-devel] Automake 1.10 vs. Automake 1.9.5

[Philip Mason]

No bad symptoms ...  I wanted to see if the preliminary tar ball I got
of geos-3.1.0 matched the official version.   The diff tool said there
were 107 file differences, mostly in Makefile.in and the various
build-related generated files.   

In terms of substantive code changes, there were only 4 or 5 source
files that I needed to merge into my working copy ...

Thanks for the quick response,

- - - Philip


-----Original Message-----
From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:09 PM
To: GEOS Development List
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] Automake 1.10 vs. Automake 1.9.5

Looks like the version on upload.osgeo.org is 1.9.5 and my personal
desktop version is 1.10, so that probably explains it. If I build a
tarball and upload it, you get one thing, if I build the ball on
osgeo.org you get another. Are you experiencing bad symptoms from
this?

P

2009/3/20 Philip Mason <PMason at ecopy.com>:
> Just an FYI :
>
>
>
> It appears that some of the developers are using Automake 1.10 and
some are
> using Automake 1.9.5 ...
>
>
>
> The Makefile.in files in the source tree seem to flop back and forth.
>
>
>
> Is one version that preferred over the other -- perhaps based on
platform?
>
>
>
> - - - Philip Mason
>
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> eCopy, Inc.
>
> pmason a at t ecopy d.o.t com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel