[geos-devel] Benchmark between various geometry libraries

[Paul Ramsey]

Probably something as simple as running Maxime's test polygons and
watching the profile in Shark would give the answer, since the
difference is so huge.

P.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Martin Davis <mbdavis at refractions.net> wrote:
>
>
> Maxime van Noppen wrote:
>>
>> It's quite interesting to have some numbers though, as sometimes they
>> can lead to significant performance boost (CascadedPolygonUnion is a
>> good example). It might be interesting to analyze why geos is 23x slower
>> than other geometry libraries in some cases whereas it competes with
>> them elsewhere.
>>
>>
>
> Yes, definitely it's nice to have examples of how things can be improved.
>
> Personally I intend to stay well away from any C++ template hacking, though!
>
> --
> Martin Davis
> Senior Technical Architect
> Refractions Research, Inc.
> (250) 383-3022
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>