[geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

[Mateusz Loskot]

I'd rather wait for more votes than two.

If no more votes arrive, I'll mark the RFC 5 as referred or withdrawn.

Mateusz

P.s. sorry for top-posting, sent from not-my-mobile

On 1 Apr 2017 1:44 p.m., "Sandro Santilli" <strk at kbt.io> wrote:

> Given 2 positive votes and no vetos over a period of 2 working days
> I declare the proposal ACCEPTED by the PSC (somewhat reduced in
> responsiveness, but that's to be dealt with another time).
>
> Mateusz: dunno if you want to update its status to be "accepted"
> or something like that ...
>
> --strk;
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:03:48PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > On 29 March 2017 at 23:18, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
> > > Dear PSC, All,
> > >
> > > For your delectation, RFC5 <https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC5>
> > >
> > > This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as
> > > minimum supported version of C++ language.
> > >
> > > Please review, provide your feedback.
> >
> > FYI, I have clarified a few things:
> >
> > * Although C++11 is not set as default mode, GEOS does currently
> > compile with C++11 compiler.
> >
> > * Added C++14 section to explain limitations and plans beyond C++11
> >
> > Those changes are not substantial to the proposal itself.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > geos-devel mailing list
> > geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20170401/5b85a1c2/attachment.html>