[geos-devel] Thoughts on Backporting the emit warning message to GEOS 3.6 and GEOS 3.5

Greg Troxel gdt at lexort.com
Sat Oct 7 07:24:40 PDT 2017

Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:03:58PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
>> I'm only softly proposing this but want to get a feel if anyone has issues
>> before we do.
>> https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/geos/geos/pulls/14
>> I would like to back port this pull to GEOS 3.6 and GEOS 3.5 branches.
> I think only bugfixes should be backported.

(I am not caught up on this whole thread) The point about -Werror is an
excellent one.  For that reason, I don't think backporting is a good
idea.  And I agree with strk about only bugfixes, more or less.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20171007/5e750094/attachment.sig>

More information about the geos-devel mailing list