[geos-devel] Remove ttmath?

[Paul Ramsey]

Thanks, I'm going to procede to merge to master when I'm green on CI.
I have added all the JTS tests, so I feel good about the foundation.
Once I have merge to master, I'm going to experiment with adding one of the new bigendian architectures supported by Travis into the CI (because more CI!)

P.

> On Apr 16, 2020, at 4:46 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:16:52PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> 
>> The only reason we're using ttmath is because Mateusz happened to
>> choose it for his initial experiments on supporting the higher precision
>> code in JTS. Turns out there's no reason we cannot use exactly the same
>> routines as JTS does, though, and they have NO ENDIAN assumptions in them,
>> so they'll be portable.
> 
> +1 for that, JTS routines seems best option to me.
> 
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel