[geos-devel] mingw64 file libs changed

Regina Obe lr at pcorp.us
Wed Jun 15 12:23:15 PDT 2022


Back to old names now.

Thanks,
Regina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 1:08 PM
> To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] mingw64 file libs changed
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jun 15, 2022, at 9:32 AM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> >
> > Now I see libgeos_c-1.dll and libgeos.dll.
> >
> > It's different from 3.9 and 3.10, which had libgeos_c.dll for the
> > c-api lib file but I'm fine with that.  Just want to make sure you
> > intended to keep that change.
> 
> Nope, missed a spot. Main should be back to original behaviour now.
> 
> P
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regina
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 12:17 PM
> >> To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> Cc: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no
> >> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] mingw64 file libs changed
> >>
> >> This is in main now.
> >>
> >> P
> >>
> >>> On Jun 14, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sandro,
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure I understand your question.
> >>>
> >>> The issue is not the linking of my code. It's the dependency of
> >>>
> >>> libgeos_c-1.dll
> >>>
> >>> To libgeos-3.11.0.dll
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to get rid of.
> >>>
> >>> All my code ends up having a dependency on libgeos_c-1.dll  (before
> >>> libgeos_c.dll) Which before linked to a unversioned libgeos.dll
> >>> (this libgeos.dll was always called that so could be cleanly removed
> >>> and
> >>> replaced)
> >>>
> >>> I don't care about if the c dll is called libgeos_c-1.dll or
> > libgeos_c.dll.
> >>> It's the annoyance of that c++ dll changing with every micro release.
> >>> Cause these are harder to predict and uninstall as part of an
> >>> install
> > process.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Sandro Mani [mailto:manisandro at gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 1:50 PM
> >>>> To: Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us>; 'GEOS Development List' <geos-
> >>>> devel at lists.osgeo.org>; Roger.Bivand at nhh.no
> >>>> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] mingw64 file libs changed
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you point me to the Makefile / ... which is doing this linking?
> >>>> It should never be necessary to point to a versioned shared library
> >>>> name in a link command line. Static libraries are unversioned, and
> >>>> for the dynamic libraries the corresponding import libraries are
> >>>> also
> >> unversioned.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sandro
> >>>>
> >>>> On 14.06.22 18:21, Regina Obe wrote:
> >>>>> In my case, I need the c++ library statically linked into the geos
> > C-api.
> >>>>> I need the geos c-API shared but not the c++ one.  The main reason
> >>>>> for need of c-api shared is all the extensions I ship rely on that.
> >>>>> So I don't want both statically linked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also for regression testing I do want to replace the c-lib without
> >>>>> having to recompile all my extensions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dan and strk had suggested a way to have the c++ be object .a so
> >>>>> it can be statically linked to the c lib.
> >>>>> I'm not sure how to do that in Cmake or if it is even currently
> > possible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So Sandro - my annoyance with your change is now I have this extra
> >>>>> c++ lib to worry about which was always a static name before and
> >>>>> c++ now
> >>>>> is changing with each micro release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Regina
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On
> >>>>>> Behalf Of Sandro Mani
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 8:00 AM
> >>>>>> To: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no; GEOS Development List <geos-
> >>>>>> devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] mingw64 file libs changed
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just a note: library versioning only applies to shared libraries,
> >>>>>> static
> >>>>> libraries
> >>>>>> are unversioned. And FWIW, import libraries are also unversioned.
> >>>>>> So no
> >>>>> link
> >>>>>> command should be affected (unless you are linking against the
> >>>>>> dll shared library rather than the dll.a import library).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sandro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 14.06.22 12:59, Roger Bivand wrote:
> >>>>>>> In R >= 4.2, Windows static linked binary packages linking to
> >>>>>>> GEOS use MXE, locally updating the MXE use of GEOS 3.6.2 to 3.9.1:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/WindowsBuilds/winutf8/
> >>>>>>> uc
> >>>>>>> rt
> >>>>>>> 3/
> >>>>>>> toolchain_libs/mxe/src/geos.mk
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We currently hot-patch geos-config to modify it for static libs:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/WindowsBuilds/winutf8/
> >>>>>>> uc rt 3/ toolchain_libs/mxe/src/geos-1-fixes.patch
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We could hot-patch files in a GEOS >= 3.11.0 tarball to remove
> >>>>>>> instructions creating versioned libraries, but have not yet
> >>>>>>> tested RC1. R packages also need to list static linked libraries
> >>>>>>> by name, and revising each of a dozen or so at each GEOS release
> >>>>>>> would be error
> >>>>> prone.
> >>>>>>> Is a cmake option a way to satisfy both those needing versioned,
> >>>>>>> or unversioned library names?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Does anyone else use MXE; if so, might it make sense to feed
> >>>>>>> changes in GEOS forward to MXE?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best wishes,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Roger
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> geos-devel mailing list
> >>>>>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> geos-devel mailing list
> >>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geos-devel mailing list
> >> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel



More information about the geos-devel mailing list