[geos-devel] PSC Vote: RFC 11 Geos Versioning and EOL Policy

[Daniel Baston]

+1

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Martin Davis <mtnclimb at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:34 AM Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>
>> Here is my formal request to vote on:
>>
>> https://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc11/
>>
>> To accompany that change we will
>>
>> 1) Put a link on https://libgeos.org/usage/download/  to that policy.
>> 2) Put in a Final Release Date column on the download page (maybe
>> color-coded, though not sure how to color code in markdown so maybe we'll
>> skip that)
>> Red - past EOL
>> Yellow - EOL eminent
>> Not sure it's worth to color code newer
>>
>> 3) For releases not reached EOL yet, set the expected EOL to 3-4 years
>> from
>> the .0 release.
>>
>> Not sure what to do with 3.6 and 3.7, both are passed 4 years
>>
>> 3.6.0 was released 2016-10-25 (more than 5 years ago) (Dan mentioned this
>> is
>> still in Ubuntu LTS 18, which will be eol'd in April 2023), do we wait or
>> just EOL it now.
>>
>> 3.7.0 was released 2018-09-10  -- about 4 years ago, so I would consider
>> this on the potential chopping block given the above proposed policy.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geos-devel mailing list
>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20220920/efef6256/attachment.htm>