[geos-devel] CoverageUnion

[Daniel Baston]

> We have not been able to conjure up a way to note non-coverage inputs
> without incurring a huge performance penalty.


I think the area test we have been using catches many non-contrived cases
with essentially no penalty. What is the benefit to removing it?

Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20230429/01b4ea83/attachment.htm>