[GRASS-SVN] r29666 - grass/trunk/raster/r.coin

[svn_grass at osgeo.org]

Author: epatton
Date: 2008-01-11 15:41:18 -0500 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 29666

Modified:
   grass/trunk/raster/r.coin/description.html
Log:
Standardized section headings

Modified: grass/trunk/raster/r.coin/description.html
===================================================================
--- grass/trunk/raster/r.coin/description.html	2008-01-11 19:13:47 UTC (rev 29665)
+++ grass/trunk/raster/r.coin/description.html	2008-01-11 20:41:18 UTC (rev 29666)
@@ -50,6 +50,20 @@
 
 <P>
 
+<H2>NOTES</H2>
+
+It is <B>not</B> a good idea to run <EM>r.coin</EM> on a
+map layer which has a monstrous number of categories (e.g.,
+unreclassed elevation).  Because <EM>r.coin</EM> reports
+information for each and every category, it is better to
+reclassify those categories (using <EM>r.reclass</EM>)
+into a more manageable number prior to running
+<EM>r.coin</EM> on the reclassed raster map layer.
+
+<P>
+
+<H2>EXAMPLE</H2>
+
 Below is a sample of tabular output produced by
 <EM>r.coin</EM>.  Here, map output is stated in units of
 square miles.  The report tabulates the coincidence of the
@@ -158,16 +172,6 @@
 +--------------------------------+
 </PRE>
 
-<H2>NOTES</H2>
-
-It is <B>not</B> a good idea to run <EM>r.coin</EM> on a
-map layer which has a monstrous number of categories (e.g.,
-unreclassed elevation).  Because <EM>r.coin</EM> reports
-information for each and every category, it is better to
-reclassify those categories (using <EM>r.reclass</EM>)
-into a more manageable number prior to running
-<EM>r.coin</EM> on the reclassed raster map layer.
-
 <P>
 
 <EM>r.coin</EM> calculates the coincidence of two raster