[GRASS5] v.in,dxf
Roger S. Miller
rgrmill at rt66.com
Fri May 18 15:34:33 EDT 2001
On Fri, 18 May 2001, David D Gray wrote:
> No, it's substantially similar. But this is the reason why we should
> separate out the two phases of the import - so that we don't have to
> duplicate effort. The other advantage is that we can utilise suitable
> 3rd party libraries to handle their respective formats. Which is the
> gist of what you are saying I think.
Great, I think I'm on the same page with you :). Is there any sort of
timetable for that generic capability to be in place?
Roger Miller
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list