[GRASS5] v.in,dxf

Roger S. Miller rgrmill at rt66.com
Fri May 18 15:34:33 EDT 2001


On Fri, 18 May 2001, David D Gray wrote:

> No, it's substantially similar. But this is the reason why we should
> separate out the two phases of the import - so that we don't have to
> duplicate effort. The other advantage is that we can utilise suitable
> 3rd party libraries to handle their respective formats. Which is the
> gist of what you are saying I think.


Great, I think I'm on the same page with you :).  Is there any sort of
timetable for that generic capability to be in place?


Roger Miller




More information about the grass-dev mailing list