[GRASS5] Using CVS to manage "experimental" vs. "stable" trees

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Tue Apr 23 13:46:35 EDT 2002


On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 05:19:07PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
> The 5.0.x releases should be made from the same branch as 5.0.0. 

From the same tree: "grass5".
We will need several release branches for
having parallel release critical bug-fixes for going out of beta.
These branches shall collapse _fast_. (A month or two.)

> They should differ from 5.0.0 only in terms of bug fixes. 

Yes, bug fixes and minor enhancements or changes.
Only critical bug fixes in the release branches.

> It would be possible to add new modules 
> (which work with the existing libraries),

-> minor enhancements

> but I would suggest that developers work on the next major version instead.

That is what the grass51 tree is for. :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020423/4c12ca56/attachment.bin


More information about the grass-dev mailing list