[GRASS5] Deprecate d.area and d.vect.line ??
neteler at itc.it
Wed Feb 6 01:40:53 EST 2002
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:29:46PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:47:43 +0100, Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:57:28AM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:09:36 +0100, Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:59:34PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > > > > I would like to deprecate d.area (and possibly d.vect.cats ?) in favor of
> > > > > d.vect.area. Also, there's the matter of v.area. Do people use it?
> > > > > What does it provide that d.what.vect doesn't do (besides the flood
> > > > > fill, which doesn't handle islands)?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, please go ahead... But: the d.vect.cats is the upcoming
> > > > d.vect. Before you delete I will migrate d.vect.cats to d.vect :-)
> > > > Any objections?
> > >
> > > Oh, okay.
> > So.. done. d.vect.cats is now d.vect.
> Markus, do you realize d.vect.cats does not handle islands/holes correctly?
Oh - actually not. However, my only intention was to merge two similar
modules. The island problem is the next step.
> Compare: http://pweb.jps.net/~egm2/d.vect.cats.jpg vs.
> http://pweb.jps.net/~egm2/d.vect.area.jpg -- note: I drew the line work
> a second time for d.vect (because the interiors got clobbered).
> It should be relatively easy to remedy via G_plot_area().
May I pass this to you? Maybe you want to merge/replace again
with your new d.vect.line?
Ideally there is only one vector drawing tool in future, we already
have too many (similar) modules.
Thanks for pointing out the problem,
More information about the grass-dev