[GRASS5] The status of 5.0

[Thomas Koester]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:09:41PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
> > Bernhard: Can we add something to allow the bug reporting person
> > to set the "priority" while *submitting* the bug? 
> 
> In principle: yes. I will ask Thomas to help to add maybe three
> simple categories to the script.

That should be no problem. Which priorities should offered? They
will be shown in RT as values from 00 to 99, so I think, selection
of initial priorities may look like this:

10 - unimportant
20
30 - normal
40
50 - important
60
70 - severe
80
90 - critical/security bug

(maybe there could be better descriptions, this is just an idea)

> We also should add a field for the name of the GRASS version
> and simplify the form in general. The background is that we want the
> GRASS version number in the report if the report sits there for
> a long time.

That's no problem.

> > To have all
> > on level "30" doesn't make sense if the reporting person already
> > knows that it is critical (or not). Or do I just have to add something
> > in the report form?
> 
> Developers familiar with the bugtracker can bypath the form and get
> full power anyway, e.g. using:
> 
> 	http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?queue_id=grass&display=Create_Step2

That's right, but adding priorities to the report form is no problem.

Thomas

P.S.: I'm not on this list, so please CC to my address.

-- 
Email: tkoester at intevation.de
http://intevation.de/~tkoester/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020322/f539864d/attachment.bin