[GRASS5] The status of 5.0
Eric G. Miller
egm2 at jps.net
Mon Mar 25 21:18:14 EST 2002
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:16:34AM -0700, rgrmill at rt66.com wrote:
>
> Glynn wrote:
>
> > Note that the monitor sockets no longer live in <mapset>/.tmp/...,
> but
> > in /tmp/grass-<user>.
>
> That change was made in 5.0 since pre2?
>
> That seems like a good change, but not necessarily better then saving
> under a user's ".grass" directory, which was the original option.
> Hopefully this was done in such a way that it won't cause me major
> update problems. Clearly while this change might be benign it should
> serve as an example of how changes in GRASS could make it very difficult
> to upgrade a production GRASS installation.
>
> Further, this is a pretty fundamental change. This along with some
> relatively recent changes in the monitor procedures just reinforce my
> impression that GRASS5.0 is *not* yet stable.
It was really needed to keep the file path below the 104 character limit
for socket file paths. Some people were hitting it. I'd hardly
characterize it as a "fundamental" change, since most everything
couldn't care less where the file really lives. Now, the change from
LZW to ZLIB for floating point raster *was* a fundamental change. The
work Radim has been doing for GRASS 5.1 vector are fundamental. This,
however, is a small implementation detail. There was some question if
the socket file could be reliably placed under $HOME, due to remote
mounts and such... Using /tmp is a pretty safe bet to be a local
mount.
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2 at jps.net>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list