neteler at itc.it
Wed Apr 23 06:16:39 EDT 2003
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:55:38AM +0200, Radim Blazek wrote:
> It means that G_get_null_value_row() takes more than 230%
> of the time required for G_get_c_raster_row() (if NULLs not read).
> It must be possible to improve performance of G_get_null_value_row()
> but rasters are not my hobby.
> BTW: It seems that raster values are masked by NULLs in current region
> resolution instead of original raster map resolution. I am not sure if it is good.
> That is probably more general problem of conversion of rasters to current region.
There was some time ago a discussion on NULLs
Maybe interesting in this context.
More information about the grass-dev