[GRASS5] GRASS development roadmap proposal

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:47:40AM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:48:34PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > 
> > Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > 
> > > 	It all only makes sense if the 5.3.x cycle is 
> > > 	compartively very short.
> > 
> > In that case, it might be better to skip the 5.3.x naming, and just
> > use 5.4.0-pre1, -pre2 etc.

We could,
but having the first one as 5.3.0 release might be okay,
because it really did not have much testing.

> Maybe yes (especially if it helps to get the developers more interested
> in the 5.1/5.7 development).
> However, the entire proposal only works if all developers agree.

It won't help get people interested in 5.7 much im my eyes.
But that doesn't matter I believe.

We do clear naming for our own sake and our users
and working in a structured way over the long term will
attract more developers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20030721/49bac7a1/attachment.bin