[GRASS5] Re: 5.7: Datum transformation - DHDN?
Markus Neteler
neteler at itc.it
Wed Oct 6 11:17:37 EDT 2004
Hello Paul,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:18:37PM +0100, Paul Kelly wrote:
> Hello Markus
>
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> >Hello Paul
> >(cc grass5)
> >
> >I'm just having import fun with projections and would like
> >to hear your opinion:
> >
> >Trying to import the German FRIDA free vector data extended by a .prj
> >file which looks like this:
> >
> >cat frida-1.0-shp-joined/proj.prj
> >PROJCS["Transverse
> >Mercator",GEOGCS["bessel",DATUM["D_Deutsche_Hauptdreiecksnetz",SPHEROID["bessel",6377397.155,299.1528128]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["Degree",0.017453292519943295]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",9],PARAMETER["scale_factor",1],PARAMETER["false_easting",3500000],PARAMETER["false_northing",0],UNIT["Meter",1]]
> >
> >I face the following problem:
> >
> >v.in.ogr dsn=frida-1.0-shp-joined/strassen-joined.shp output=strassen
> >location=frida
> >A datum name potsdam (Deutsches_Hauptdreiecksnetz) was specified without
> >transformation parameters.
> >
> >Now select Datum Transformation Parameters
> >Enter 'list' to see the list of available Parameter sets
> >Enter the corresponding number, or <RETURN> to cancel request
> >>
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> If you type list here it should give you a choice of the GRASS parameters
> for the DHDN/Potsdam datum, I think.
Yes, right:
>list
Number Details
---
1 Used in Germany (Sachsen)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=612.4,77.0,440.2,-0.054,0.057,-2.797,2.55)
Accuracy <1m
---
2 Used in Germany (Thüringen)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=599.4,72.4,419.2,-0.063,-0.022,-2.723,6.46)
Accuracy <1m
---
3 Used in Germany (West - North - 52d20'N to 55d00'N)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=590.5,69.5,411.6,-0.796,-0.052,-3.601,8.30)
Accuracy <1m
---
4 Used in Germany (West - Middle - 50d20'N to 52d20'N)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=584.8,67.0,400.3,0.105,0.013,-2.378,10.29)
Accuracy <1m
---
5 Used in Germany (West - South - 47d00N to 50d20'N)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=597.1,71.4,412.1,0.894,0.068,-1.563,7.58)
Accuracy <1m
---
6 Used in Germany (Whole Country)
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=598.1,73.7,418.2,0.202,0.045,-2.455,6.70)
Accuracy 3m
---
7 Used in Default potsdam region
(PROJ.4 Params towgs84=606.000,23.000,413.000)
Default 3-Parameter Transformation
Probably it's not a good idea to automatically
select a datum here (on the other hand most users won't know
which one is the correct datum).
Checking the extent could be done via OGR of course:
ogrinfo -summary strassen-joined.shp strassen-joined
INFO: Open of `strassen-joined.shp'
using driver `ESRI Shapefile' successful.
Layer name: strassen-joined
Geometry: Line String
Feature Count: 12323
Extent: (3427000.290000, 5787594.240000) - (3444004.000000, 5800876.470000)
[...]
(maybe ogrinfo should report in LatLong as well such as gdalinfo does)
The data extent matches:
'3 Used in Germany (West - North - 52d20'N to 55d00'N)'
As usual it's difficult to find out which datum the vendor used
when preparing the data set (hi Intevation!).
> >Checking the name, reports:
> >grep -i Hauptdreiec ~/grass57/lib/gis/*
> >~/grass57/lib/gis/datum.table:potsdam "Deutsches_Hauptdreiecksnetz"
> >bessel dx=606.0 dy=23.0 dz=413.0
> >
> >Since ESRI uses the (gramatically wrong) 'D_Deutsche_Hauptdreiecksnetz',
> >GRASS fails to
> >find the values. So far no surprise.
>
> But note that the warning message from GRASS used the correct format. I
> believe this is due to some good work by Frank in the OSRMorphFromESRI()
> from function which is called by GRASS to fix things up before importing
> the projection information, so I don't think there is a problem here
> really.
Agreed.
> >To overcome the problem I would like to add 'D_Deutsche_Hauptdreiecksnetz'
> >in lib/gis/datum.table.
>
> The 'correct' way to do this (although it's really a bit of a hack) is to
> add two lines to the static const char *papszDatumEquiv[] in
> lib/proj/convert.c and recompile. The first one should be the 'wrong'
> value that has occured in your data, and the second one the value in the
> GRASS datum.table. I did this for the New Zealand 2000 datum that Hamish
> was having some trouble with. Probably the even more correct way to fix it
> is to ask Frank to add some code to OGR to fix it.
>
> But as I said I don't think it's necessary here---please check.
Still we have two choices here, 'Whole Country' and 'North-West Germany'
(am I right?). Not sure what to do.
Probably there is no solution for this case (?).
Markus
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list