[GRASS5] bugs

[Hamish]

> - wait a couple of days and close it if there was no response
>   and the bug obviously outdated

               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Shouldn't we keep a list of known GRASS 5.4 bugs somewhere rather than
just forgetting about them? e.g. 5.4's v.digit "won't fix" bugs.


I think we need to have some sort of "confirmed", "unreproducable", or
"new" tag column for bugs, so we can separate out valid bugs from
misconfigured systems at least, giving a more realistic bug number.


We should not be closing bug reports just because there are a lot of bug
reports. Clean up the bug list, sure; as long as it is by actually
fixing bugs, and not just forgetting them!




Hamish