[GRASS5] r.flow: strange compile error M_PI
Paul Kelly
paul-grass at stjohnspoint.co.uk
Tue Jun 28 12:20:32 EDT 2005
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Brad Douglas wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 23:38 +1200, Hamish wrote:
>>> Personally, I would just conditionalise the local definitions, e.g.:
>>>
>>> #ifndef M_PI
>>> #define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846
>>> #endif
>>
>> why not go straight to the long?
>>
>> 3.1415926535897932384626433832795029
>> or
>> 3.1415926535897932384626433832795029L
>>
>> (but don't call that M_PI)
>
> That should be called M_PIl.
>
> I like the idea of adding these macros to gis.h, if not sorting it out
> with autoconf (still my favored method).
I think the logic with autoconf should be to use it if it simplifies
things; in this case it appears to make it more complicated so the simple
solution is better. Unless it is possibel for the definition of M_PI in math.h
to be somehow "better" than our own version. It actually probably makes the
output of GRASS more consistent cross-platform if every module is always
using the same definition (in gis.h), rather than perhaps that or perhaps
the one in math.h, depending on compiler options and platform-specific
stuff.
Just my impression,
Paul
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list