[GRASS5] PATCH: int => size_t
Glynn Clements
glynn at gclements.plus.com
Thu May 5 23:10:12 EDT 2005
Brad Douglas wrote:
> The attached patch is of primary interest to 64-bit boxen (read: me),
> but is also of interest for Large File Support on account of
> G_raster_size().
>
> Any objections to me applying this?
Yes. Changing the return type of G_raster_size() to size_t will affect
calculations involving negative numbers; please use ssize_t instead.
OTOH, the changes to the *alloc functions seem OK.
Also, I don't see how this relates to LFS; that depends upon off_t,
not size_t.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list